I AM PAUL WILSON

So I watched the entire so-called health-care summit yesterday. It was laid out and designed to embarrass and put down Republicans. But the Republicans surprised me they came well prepared they were, courteous and got their points across. and Obama turned out looking like a complete fool.  
When one of the Republicans was talking the Democrats sat there looking down or staring off into space. They refused to look at the person who was talking.
Obama true to his Marxist upbringing interrupted or cut off every Republican that was speaking he would then blather on for 15 minutes about whatever usually not answering any issues the Republicans raised and then call on a Democrat to talk. He accused Republicans of using props, bringing props to the summit. The props he was referring to was the 2700 page health-care bill of his.
I was really hoping to see one of the Republicans pick up that bill throw it in the nearest trash can and then all of the Republicans get up say this is useless and walk out of the room. But that is just me, I guess that would not be good politics. I cannot see anything good coming out of this summit, I take that back the Republicans showed that they have the balls a couple of them showed that they have big brass balls and I give them a plus on that regard.
We will see where it goes from here. Will the Democrats decide to commit political suicide and push this thing through with out the help of any Republicans? I doubt that Pelosi has the votes in the House and they have to pass the Senate bill in the House before it can go any further. Pelosi, Reid and Obama are just crazy enough tone deaf enough to try that. They seem to have no clue as to what the American people really want they seem to be of the mindset that this is what you need were going to do it for your own good no matter what you say. Well, I say Screw You. I think an overwhelming number of people are going to say the same thing in November at the polls, at least I hope so.

I am praying with every bone in my body for Scott Brown to win this election.

I hope he wins with a large enough margin to overcome the voter fraud from Acorn and SEIU thugs. The Democrats are desperate to win this election, they will resort to anything to win. If it turns out to be a landslide for Brown. I don’t see how they can refuse to seat him immediately and that would give the GOP enough votes to filibuster and stop the Healthcare Bill and And Cap N Trade bill.
Barney Frank is already calling for the elimination of the filibuster rule. They will resort to absolutely anything to stay in power.
Michelle Malkin has a video of a woman in front of one of the polling places this morning, handing out blank absentee ballots and instructing the people how to mark the ballot for the Democrat. Why she was not arrested on the spot I do not know. Oh I know why the Democrat candidate is the Massachusetts Attorney General The deadline for absentee ballots in Massachusetts was last Friday. If someone was doing that and encouraging people to mark the ballot for the Republican. The outrage would be nationwide throughout the media.
So anyway, if you live in Massachusetts, and you are conservative or against bigger government, get your butt to the polls and vote for Scott Brown.

I have a great deal of fear of what is going to happen next in our country. With Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats cramming this monstrosity down our throats. It almost seems like the Senate Republicans are caving in and allowing them to pass the subsequent votes needed to get it passed and sent to the House for Conference.  Our only hope is that the 2010 elections give the Republicans a super majority in both the House of Representatives and Senate. If they can get a veto proof majority in both houses they can overturn this monstrosity and get things back where they belong, I like my health insurance, and I don’t want anybody screwing with it. Below are just a few of the monstrous things in this bill. 2012, cannot get here soon enough for me, our only hope is that someone like Sarah Palin could be elected in 2012. If she decides to run. I am pretty confident that she can win.

• Medicare is slashed by $470 billion, including cuts to Medicare home health care services. These are cuts the Congressional Budget Office says will "reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care” for seniors

• Medicare Advantage is cut $120 billion for seniors

• Raises taxes by $518 billion, including new taxes on the middle class, new taxes on wheelchairs, pacemakers, heart valves, and other medical devices, and new taxes on individuals and employers who do not retain the type of health care plans that Washington dictates

• Senate Democrats’ bill creates an Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) of non-elected government bureaucrats, empowered to cut Medicare providers limited access to care for seniors

• The bill forces a huge unfunded federal mandate on states to expand Medicaid, with the exception of those states where Democrat senators cut “sweetheart deals” with Obama and Reid for their vote

I honestly and foolishly thought that it would take him at least. His first term, or only term to destroy this country. Now he’s on the doorstep of destroying the country in one year, one vote away from destroying the healthcare of the United States. The people in the House of Representatives and the Senate who voted for this piece of crap can not be punished enough. I honestly don’t know if this thing could be overturned. Once past and put into law, because we all know the President Zero will sign it. He is absolutely desperate to get anything passed, no matter what kind of piece of crap that is.
I don’t know who wrote this I found it on Newsbusters in light of things it seems quite appropriate. I would like to wish everyone a Merry Christmas, enjoy it while we still have the freedom to do so.

Congress’ Night Before Christmas

"Twas the week before Christmas    and  those sly little elves,
Our congressmen, labored to better themselves.
They cared not a whit what the public might think
"Let them eat cake," some said with a wink.

And putting their thumbs to the tip of their nose,
they waved as they shouted "Anything goes!"

They scoffed at the thought that we might object,
to a tax cut for the wealthy of a posh percent.
They’ve got prerequisites-franking, per diem, and more —
bargain-priced haircuts and gyms (three or four!)

Paid speaking engagements and meals on the cuff,
celebrity status — (they’ve sure got it tough!),

Yet they claim they’re in touch with the man on the street,
as John Q. Public struggles to make both ends meet.
If all workers decided what they were due,
they’d be getting those fat paychecks too!

But while we take cutbacks or raises quite small,
and one out of 20 has no job at all,
our millionaire Congress decides on the budget
land trimming Medicare and Medicaid will do it, they say.

In this season for giving, our Congress is taking.
We’ve had it with them and our backs are breaking.
With hard times, disasters, and layoffs on our dockets,
we bit the bullet and they fill their pockets!

Oh jobless, oh homeless, oh desperate and needy –
dare anyone say our Congress is greedy?

If in this feeling I’m not alone,
take up your pen or pick up your phone.
As dry leaves before the wild hurricane fly,
let the road of your anger mount to the sky.

Indignant, outraged, appalled and beset
let your congressman know that you won’t forget!
When election times comes — and certain it will —
you’re voting him out for passing that bill.

More rapid than eagles, their elections assured
they toasted each other and laughed at the herd.
And I heard them exclaim with adjournment at hand,

"Merry Christmas to us, and the public be damned!

In case you haven’t heard or read, the Environmental Protection Agency has decided that every time you exhale. You are committing a crime against nature and the planet. They have declared that CO2 is a pollutant and must be removed from the face of the earth, I guess these Invirofascists don’t realize that plants live on CO2. Between the Environmental Protection Agency and  the California Air Resources Board, or CARB, they are determined to destroy the state of California. And this country. Now our dear leader, Pres. zero is in Copenhagen, and you can bet that he will sign whatever piece of shit agreement they come up with. He certainly doesn’t care that it might damage this country. After all that is what he wants to do he wants to destroy this country and the economy. I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t really want to live in a seventh century country. In case you don’t know it bats live in caves, and I have an aversion to bats. And now on to my second subject which would be Chris Matthews.

The leftist in this country are constantly going after Sarah Palin and I know why. She scares them to death. She is conservative, she is a woman, a proud mother, happily married and also is much smarter than the vast majority of them.

I truly believe that Chris Matthews has jumped the shark and lost his mind. His continued vicious attacks on Sarah Palin absolutely make no sense she never did anything to him she’s never even said something nasty about him like he does her maybe just maybe Chrissy boy has a thing for Sarah Palin,  no. That’s probably not possible since he got a tingle up his leg watching Obama. He really needs to either come out of the closet or stop inserting himself into every conversation about Sarah Palin, come on Chrissy open that door, come on out of the closet. I personally don’t watch MSNBC because I think it’s a garbage network anyway and every time I hear about something that they have broadcast on that cable channel reinforces my decision to not ever watch the sons of bitches. On a recent episode of his stupid program hardball on MSNBC, he went into one rant after another chiding his guests Politico’s Jonathan Martin and USA Today’s Susan Page for not going after her tooth and nail every opportunity they get. Here a partial transcript of his rants. It is obvious that Jnathan and Susan don’t hate her like he does, because they actually listen to her and read her book. The words in her book “Going Rogue” are hers. You can hear her voice when you read the pages.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Sarah Palin was everywhere this weekend. Here in D.C and Washington, she spoke at the Gridiron Club Saturday night. On Sunday she was in the key 2012 state of Iowa signing books for people who lined up overnight to meet her and apparently gonna work, she’s already working the Iowa caucus it seems. And also her former running mate john McCain praised her this weekend in glowing terms. Is she well positioned for 2012? USA Today’s Susan Page was at the Gridiron Club on Saturday night, part of the team. And Politico’s Jonathan Martin was at the Sioux City, Iowa bookstore. Well I gotta go to Sioux City because I have a theory that they have more votes in the Iowa Caucus than the, than Capitol Hill. Well let me ask you about, when people you interviewed as a straight print reporter, the best there is.

JONATHAN MARTIN, POLITICO: Yes sir.

MATTHEWS: When you went out to interview them, did they take her seriously as a presidential type? I’m not saying gonna vote for, do they see her in that league?

MARTIN: Absolutely. I talked to a lot of voters in that line because there was a long line and there was plenty of time waiting. And almost to a person they said that they would like to see her run for president. And that they would not just vote for her, but would caucus for her, too. That’s an important distinction. Because a lot of her supporters are not party regular types. They have not, Chris, caucused in the past. So this would be-

MATTHEWS: Were they all white people?

MARTIN: Almost entirely.

MATTHEWS: What do you mean almost?

MARTIN: I saw one African-American.

MATTHEWS: Okay, But it is a certain sort of, what do you call it, socio-metric group that she appeals to.

MARTIN: Absolutely. It’s a working class, middle class group. Very populist, very conservative. Not always, but again not always totally Republican. Some of these folks come from outside the party. Which is why she’s so formidable. She could enlarge the caucuses by bring in folks that don’t typically participate.

MATTHEWS: Okay who are they?

MARTIN: They are evangelical Christians. They are folks that have kids, with, with, you know, Down Syndrome, like she does.

MATTHEWS: Sure.

MARTIN: They are sportsmen. They are folks that are really ticked off at Washington. Very, very angry that sort of tea party crowd. That is her element. That’s her demographic. And they feel very strongly about her. And they’re willing to camp out overnight to see her in 10-degree weather, and then they’re going to wait the next morning for five hours until she gets there. This is a dedicated crowd.

MATTHEWS: Okay here she is, and just this weekend, just to show she can switch hit, she was before your crowd, the more mature journalists in Washington. No it takes a while to get in that club. I’m respectable. It’s a respectable group. But didn’t she do a lot of self-deprecation, the other night, to show that she could be one of the boys?

SUSAN PAGE, USA TODAY: You know she did it and this was not her demographic. This was not a group that she thinks is…

MATTHEWS: It was a self-important Washington journalist crowd.

PAGE: Yeah it’s a kind of, people who have given her a pretty rough ride I think in print. She was self-deprecating. She gave a few barbs too…

MATTHEWS: And who wrote this stuff for her?

PAGE: Well I hear second hand that Eric Schnur who’s a-

MATTHEWS: Does it bother the press that somebody comes in there, whose book was written for them – and this is people who work. You write every day. You sweat it out getting the right words, thinking how to organize a piece, intellectualizing it and then putting it on paper. And I’m sorry, and reporting it to start with. It’s a lot of work, being a reporter. I’ve seen you guys on deadline. It’s hard work. Don’t you essentially disrespect somebody who walks in and puts a book on the table and said they wrote it, when you know somebody else did? Who comes in and gives a speech that you know somebody else wrote all the jokes for and gave it to her and she paid for it probably? Doesn’t that bother you guys? I’m arguing there.

PAGE: You know I think if it’s, I think if it’s not, if it’s not-

MATTHEWS: Does it bother you?

PAGE: No.

MATTHEWS: Why doesn’t it bother you?

PAGE: Because if it’s in her voice, like the book, I read her book, it’s in her voice. It sounds just like her. Maybe she doesn’t write it, it does reflect her in a way. And the idea, you who, you who’ve written-

MATTHEWS: But she didn’t sweat it out.

PAGE: You have written many speeches for politicians.

MATTHEWS: And I’ve written them and I’ve written books. And, and I take-

PAGE: Does it offend you?

MATTHEWS: But I have tremendous respect for you guys, on the bus, when I see you guys. I’ll sit on a bus somewhere, covering a campaign, and all of a sudden one of you people from the big papers, and all of a sudden I’ll see a 1,500 word piece taken and you’ve somehow gotten it done, in the same time I’ve been with you? I say, "When did you write this thing?" I mean there’s a lot of talent she doesn’t have, and yet she takes credit for it.

PAGE: It’s not, it’s not the talent that we ask the political figures to have. We ask them to have other talents like points of view.

MATTHEWS: Well why do you let them take credit for books and speeches they didn’t write?

PAGE: Well the book, she, I think she acknowledged a co-author on her book. And the idea that somebody wrote her speech for her, this is so not a surprise.

MATTHEWS: You know when some jock writes a book and says, "As told to," on the first page we say okay, because he’s not supposed to be a writer or a thinker, he’s supposed to be a hell of a performer. Right?

PAGE: Yes.

MATTHEWS: You can’t do everything. But when somebody claims to be an intellectual leader that’s gonna lead this country with big ideas and lead us in the right direction and puts their name on the cover of the book, shouldn’t they have written it? Just a guess.

PAGE: Well they should have played a part.

MATTHEWS: You’re so, you are such a sweetie! You are being so sweet!

MARTIN: That’s prominent part, prominent part.

MATTHEWS: Is this the new press treatment of Sarah Palin?

PAGE: Yeah, it is.

MATTHEWS: Why? You want her in this race, right?

PAGE: Right, right.

MATTHEWS: You’re luring her in. Look at this. Sarah, Governor, you watching? She’s luring you into this race. "C’mon we’re gonna be so nice to you. Eat the candy."

PAGE: If you wanted evidence that she is serious about being positioned to run in this race, look at that speech, because she doesn’t need this crowd.

MARTIN: Right.

PAGE: This crowd was not…

MATTHEWS: But she softened you up! I can tell.

PAGE: She, she yeah, like her to run for president.

MATTHEWS: I can tell she softened you guys up. She treated you with respect…biggest smart move.

MARTIN: You know here’s the message by her appearance, though, I think.

MATTHEWS: The Press Club, the group.

MARTIN: "Yeah I take some shots at you guys, but you get it, it’s just part of the game." I think that’s what-

MATTHEWS: She campaigned on her antipathy to the press-

MARTIN: I know.

MATTHEWS: -trashing Katie Couric for asking the easiest, hardball question in the world, "What do you read?"

MARTIN: So if I was a Palin supporter, If I was-

MATTHEWS: She blamed Katie Couric for asking the most obvious question.

MARTIN: Right.

MATTHEWS: She then went after Charlie Gibson, one of the nicest guys in this business and trashed him for being elitist. You know don’t tell me she hasn’t played this game.

MARTIN: Of course she’s played the game. But what I’m saying is, then she shows up here and sort of plays nice with the same crowd. So which is it?

MATTHEWS: And tickles all you guys under your chin and you go, "Oh I just love this!"

This is from 1949, but is still true and very important today. Obama knows nothing about economics as anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows. Sorry Liberals and Secular Socialists, you are one short. H/T The Angry White Guy.

Trust me Sarah Palin understands this principle and will put it in place in 2012. Go Sarah, Go.

I found this at IFPRESS. As Canada goes,- this applies to us too.The 0bambie is all set to go to Copenhagen to sign away our sovereignty.

By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN

scientific scandal dubbed "climategate," it’s because Big Government, Big Business and Big Green don’t give a s*** about "the science." They never have.

What "climategate" suggests is many of the world’s leading climate scientists didn’t either. Apparently they stifled their own doubts about recent global cooling not explained by their computer models, manipulated data, plotted ways to avoid releasing it under freedom of information laws and attacked fellow scientists and scientific journals for publishing even peer-reviewed literature of which they did not approve.

Now they and their media shills — who sneered that all who questioned their phony "consensus" were despicable "deniers," the moral equivalent of those who deny the Holocaust — are the ones in denial about the enormity of the scandal enveloping them.

So they desperately try to portray it as the routine "messy" business of science, lamely insisting, "nothing to see here folks, move along."

Before the Internet — which has given ordinary people a way to fight back against the received wisdom of so-called "wise elites" — they might have gotten away with it.

But not now, as knowledgeable climate bloggers are advancing the story and forcing the co-opted mainstream media to cover a scandal most would rather ignore.

The problem, however, is those who hijacked science to predict a looming Armageddon unless we do exactly as they say, have already done their damage.

The moment they convinced politicians the way to avert the End of Days was to put a price on emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the unholy alliance of Big Government, Big Business and Big Green was forged.

Big Government wants more of your taxes. Big Business wants more of your income. Big Green wants you and your children to bow down to its agenda of enforced austerity.

What about saving the planet, you ask? This was never about saving the planet.

This is about money and power. Your money. Their power.

If it was about saving the planet, "cap-and-trade" (a.k.a. cap-and-tax) — how Big Government, Big Business and Big Green ludicrously pretend we will "fight" global warming and "save the planet" — would have been consigned to the dust bin of history because it doesn’t work. We know it doesn’t work because Europe’s five-year-old cap-and-trade market — the Emissions Trading Scheme — has done nothing to make the world cooler.

All it’s done is make hedge fund managers, speculators and Big Energy giddy with windfall profits, while making everyone else poorer by driving up the cost of energy, and thus of most goods and services, which need energy to be lighted, heated, cooled, grown, constructed, manufactured, produced and transported.

Readers often ask how they can fight back. First, forget about asking when the warmists will see reason. They won’t.

Instead, send a message to Prime Minister Stephen Harper by e-mail (pm@pm.gc.ca), fax (1-613-941-6900) or call toll-free (1-866-599-4999) and ask to be put through to the Office of the Prime Minister.

Do the same for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff by e-mail, (ignatm@parl.gc.ca). fax, (1-613-947-0310), or call-toll free (1-866-599-4999) and ask to be put through to the Liberal Leader’s Office.

Tell them you want no part of the madness in Copenhagen.

Blow their phones off the hook.

lorrie.goldstein@sunmedia.ca

Once again the spineless Republicans have snatched defeat the from the jaws of victory. With the passage of the Stupak Amendment. They gave the blue dog Democrats the chance to cover their butts to their constituents by voting for the amendment. And then they could vote yes on the Pelosi bill. Did they wonder why so many Democrats voted for the Stupak bill? Are they so foolish that they think that amendment will be in the final product? I think not. That amendment will be shoved under the carpet gone. Perhaps if they had watched this video, they would’ve gotten a clue as to what they were doing. But I doubt it.

In this new video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, Eline van den Broek of the Netherlands needs only about four minutes to explain why government-run healthcare in Europe is a mistake .and why the problems in the U.S. healthcare system are the result of too much government, not too little