I found this at Jumping in pools

Disclaimer: I have not seen this covered anywhere else, so I can not verify the truth in this. If this is true, in my book it is grounds for impeachment or as a last resort a revolution. Perhaps that is the meat in this move, put the military in a position of the private army Zero mentioned in the campaign.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution
Conservative News and Reporting
“News for the Rest of Us”
Michele Chang

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

It is worded that way for a very good reason. Presidents can be evil, and I think this one is. Their plan sounds very much like a private army.

“The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself.” the spokesman said, “At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution.”

Yes that document is old, so let’s just toss it out. That is what is coming. Obama does not want to be bothered by something like The Constitution.

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes too far.

“Technically, we can’t talk about it before it becomes official policy.” the spokesman continued. “However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass.”

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

“The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib.”

Atrocities my ass, that entire thing was blown out of proportions by the media and eaten up by the demoncrats like they had not eaten for a week.
It was a Vere solemn moment when I took that oath. It is an oath for life. I feel as strongly now as I did then.

“We expect a lot of flak over this,” the classified memo continues. “But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control.”

Or perhaps, those who took that oath seriously and see this as a threat to The Constitution.

The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

One word can change everything and bring down a nation. This must not be allowed to happen. Lock and load while we still have that right.
It truly sounds like President Zero and his minions want to bypass the step to socialism and go straight to communism. This is a very scary time for me watching the country that I put my life on the line for, being brought down right in front of my eyes.